QED The Strange Theory of Light and Matter

Lectures by Richard Feynman

I
stumbled across a curious black book entitled *QED The Strange
Theory of Light and Matter*, by Richard Feynman. I opened to find
it was a series of lectures given in honor of Feynman’s late
wife, Alix, a literary person with physics cravings. As stated, the
lectures were constructed to be “understandable to [Alix] and
other non-physicists” (forward). QED, a.k.a. quantum
electrodynamics, seldom considered a topic for non-physicists, speaks
of electrons and photons, space-time and probability, among other
things.

Feynman placates any fears early on stating, “What one fool can
understand, another can” (x). Perhaps this is all the
confidence one needs to tackle QED. A physicist dedicated to tying
loose ends (I soon learned), Feynman qualifies QED understanding
with, “No, you’re not going to be able to understand
it…it is my task to convince you *not* to turn away
because you don’t understand it…that is because *I*
don’t understand it. Nobody does” (9). At this point
the only thing I understand is that we are all equally
misunderstanding fools!

Mixing
humor with humility, Feynman quickly engages physics from the ground
up, breaking the cycles of Venus down to the counting beans, in a
historical reference to the Mayan people. Further, he states that
all physics breaks down to the counting of beans; we learn tricky
rules simply because it’s faster. The reader is to realize
that no person of science understands *why* nature behaves as it
does; one can only know *how* nature behaves.

Introducing light as particles, the photomultiplier tube (PMT), and common light effects (bending as it enters water, reflects off a mirror, separates into colors in an oily puddle), one gets the feeling that Feynman is hand-holding. Somehow he manages to cover large topics efficiently (condensing seven years into 4 lectures). The author employs intuitive theories, likely similar to the thoughts of his audience (holes and spots in a mirror to explain transmitted and reflected waves), and picks apart the problems through simple and effective examples. The examples have a bit of an animated feel as the ‘characters’ are brought to life—“how a photon makes up its mind” (19). He carries our thoughts beyond intuition, and suddenly one finds that light traveling a non-straight path is not such an appalling idea after all! Feynman quietly slips in concepts, such as probability and amplitude, being particularly careful not to overwhelm the reader. Feynman’s blatant honesty creates a level of comfort: “We haven’t got a good model to explain partial reflection by two surfaces; we just calculate the probability that a particular PMT will be hit by a photon reflected from a sheet of glass” (24).

As the ideas slowly mounted and I grew wary of Feynman’s kindness, fearing a looming cloud of confusion, he exclaimed, “Brace yourselves for this…All we do is draw little arrows on a piece of paper” (24). Feynman, again, best qualifies his statement with, “this absurd process of combining little arrows computes the right answer for those phenomena you are familiar with” (35). Poof, the cloud disappeared.

Feynman began each lecture with the customary, “those of you
who have heard the other lectures will also find this lecture
incomprehensible, but you know that’s all right” (77),
and a quick review of what was previously discussed. It’s hard
to isolate, but hearing these words from a giant in the field and
actually feeling *comforted* by them added immensely to
Feynman’s appeal. He spoke as if sitting across from the
reader in a lounge.

I feel confident with my understanding of concepts (or at least the application of concepts) such as the Uncertainty Principle, lenses, refraction, and reflection. Feynman, however, completely revamped what I consider understanding, and in a permanent way! He offers a particularly creative approach to the Uncertainty principle involving two blocks, PMTs, and little connected arrows. When creating a lens the author whispers, “let’s ‘fool the light,’ so that all the paths take exactly the same amount of time” (57)—I suspect few are surprised to find the image is enhanced. Feynman builds a level of trust such that he can state, “the theory continues to be successful at explaining every phenomenon of light,” (59) and we believe him.

Following the first two lectures, Feynman discusses space-time
diagrams (now known as Feynman Diagrams) and the simple rules of
electron and photon activity. I never found ‘energy
quantization’ a satisfactory picture of what keeps electrons in
orbit around a nucleus; through an infinity of photon-exchanges put
forth by Feynman I hold a more reasonable explanation of what occurs.
Bragg Reflection and X-ray diffraction are easily visualized using
QED and Feynman’s little summed stopwatch arrows. (The
stopwatch spinning relates to photon frequency). It’s hardly
intuitive that photons ‘clump,’ known as stimulated
emission, a property used in laser production, but it flowed
effortlessly from *QED*.. Feynman then applies the QED to
nuclear physics and finds gross discrepancies from experiment—hence
the tangible need for new physics (QCD).

Feynman discusses issues key to all of physics, both known and unknown. While many obsess over what’s new in the field, Dr. Feynman stops us and proves that there is much to explore in what is ‘already known.’ Without this foundation physics is merely a jumble of numbers and formulae.

While *QED *was written nearly twenty years ago, the questions
in nuclear physics are largely the same—what is the source of
mass? What is the source of gravity, and can we formulate quantum
gravity? Can the forces be unified (GUT)?

I cannot envision packing more material more effectively into an undersized book (covering only four lectures). Given the scope of the project, nothing (of which I am aware) was missing from Feynman’s discussion. The points were made wonderfully lucid with thorough examples using simple materials and setups. At times one might feel the ideas simple, but further consideration exposes the genius of Richard Feynman—he has the ability to make truly subtle and complex ideas comfortable and accessible. All that is missing is another set of lectures concerning the state of affairs in physics today, a project that will unfortunately remain undone.

*QED The Strange Theory of Light and Matter* is a magical book
of physics, one I highly recommend for students of all levels. A
wayward scientist could rekindle her path with Feynman’s words.
Physics majors could be reminded that physics is fun and inspiring.
Those considering physics would be served especially well by
Feynman’s work, providing structure for much of the substance
they might soon absorb. Curious family and friends with no physics
experience should read *QED* as a third or fourth physics
book—the ideas are most effective when considered against some
underlying knowledge of the topics. I would hesitate to offer
Feynman’s book to policy makers and congressman for the simple
fact that his effortless approach almost makes physics look too easy,
and we wouldn’t want them cutting funding, would we?!