RUN 2B L1CAL MEETING MINUTES 9 January, 2003 Present o MSU: M.Abolins o Nevis: H.Evans, J.Mitrevski, J. Parsons o Northeastern: D.Wood o Saclay: E.Perez,J.Bistricky, D.Calvet L1Cal Simulation Issues: Emmanuelle Perez ------------------------ o Resuolution and Noise for TT signals - L1Cal examine --> resol & noise of current system - Check whether res in simulation is realistic - Vary these parameters . prelim studies ==> no big effect (b/c of digi step) o Performance of Digital Filter - using Denis' standalone program - Check that = 0 - Check for loss of signal peak in presence of pileup o Algorithm Studies to do - ICR . need new MC files with p13 > also useful for tracking - Tau . release this next week - Cal-Track matching . tsim_l1cal2b ==> trig jets chunk . does L1CTT do the same . if so, this is easy - Topological Studies - Note: all important for and/or term production . see web page w/ preliminary list > http://www.nevis.columbia.edu/~evans/l1cal/hardware/ trig_terms/trig_terms.html > let us know asap if you have other ideas > this will impact the TAB/GAB design o MC p13 Production Organization - nothing yet - but we will need to request this - need to produce a list of processes that we need . each group should produce a list be next week Thurs and submit to Emmanuelle ADF Simulation: Jiri Bistricky --------------- o Denis' Simulation program 1) Pattern Generator . generate amplitudes with noise . assign to different BC's . many different ways to 2) Filter . filters higher frequency comp from patt gen 3) Sampler . this is the ADC 4) Filter - Peak Finder . same as 2) but used as peak finder o Jiri's first attempt at using this - has generated 1000 pulses separated by random number of BC's . Min sep = 4 BC's - found peaks for ~2/3 of pulses . found all pulses with >4 BC separation from next - need to tune parameters/coeff's to improve this Saclay Design Status: Denis Calvet --------------------- o Drawing schematics of ADF boards - all components chosen - should be verified in a few weeks (2 weeks) . end of ADF proto design o PCB design - start before end Jan 1.5-2 weeks from now - takes 3-4 weeks ==> mid-end Feb o Bit3 Interface received at Saclay - starting to install drivers - some problems o Splitter at Fermilab - shipped Dec 20 to Dan at MSU > received - current plan: Dan is supposed to test/install this > should be sent to Fermilab next week > it is crucial that these tests are done quickly to allow us to proceed with the plans for parallel integration Nevis Design Status: Hal Evans -------------------- o Peak Finding Problem - see 12-Dec-02 meeting for details of the problem - sending peak bits on "spare" cable pairs will not work as a fallback solution . spare lines may not be connected at TAB (working on this) . would cause the loss of at least on BC tick to include this information with the TT Et's > this would break the latency budget for transfer to Cal-Track - will have to use 9-bit transfer as the fallback . probably enough resources in ADF FPGA to do this o Layout of Input section progressing well - uses up *all* the space on the back of the board . very dense - ==> no standard backplane possible for TABs . only power o Layout depends heavily on Cabling Assumptions - check cabling web page for details - http://www.nevis.columbia.edu/~evans/l1cal/hardware/ cabling/adf_to_tab_cable_map.html - cable shielding: this should be tied to ground . Vince Pavlicek asks whether this will cause ground loops . note that center pins of cable are tied to ground > the shield shouldn't add to this . need to check this further - Should we produce an Approved Cabling Document? . probably yes - Hal will take care of this o Communication with TAB/GAB by VME - Proposing a dedicated board (or section of GAB) to interface VME to TABs/GAB . uses a fast serial protocol - Firmware downloading . all TAB firmware for all boards downloaded in ~30 seconds - VME readout . transparent way of doing this given that no standard VME backplane possible for TABs - Open question: where does this sit . part of GAB: > more economical use of boards? . Separate Board > largely decouples GAB from TAB testing o Crate Issues - Need 2 slots for each TAB to be able to cable them - Not a lot of room in crate for extra cards . may want to take VME functionality out of TAB crate altogether - Does ADF SCL interface need a home? . prefered solution: put it in the back of slot-1 of ADF crate . should we foresee a dedicated VME crate to house? > TAB/GAB VME interface > ADF SCL interface