RUN 2B L1CAL MEETING MINUTES 4 November, 2004 Present o Fermilab M.Adams, S.Lammers, G.Pawloski, S.Rapisarda, A.Stone, N.Varelas, M. Camuyrano o MSU D.Edmunds, R. Brock o phone J. Mitrevski o Northeastern D.Wood o Saclay D. Calvet TWG: (S.Rapisarda) ---- o All components arrived - one generator on loan to Alan Stone for BLS cable tests o adapter to ADF backplane - being made on breadboard - a few more parts (~$200) need to be purchased Saclay (D. Calvet) ------ o Denis attended Nuclear Science Symposium in Rome, 16-22 Oct - presented talk on Design and Test of Prototype Boards for the L1 Calorimeter Trigger Upgrade at the DØ Experiment" - NSS talk linked to L1cal upgrade webpages MSU: ADF v2 (R. Brock, D.Edmunds) ----------- o Layout - finished - instructions for fab & assembly finished - Gerber files made o PCB fab & board assembly - last Monday, encouraging negotiations with firm in Wheeling, IL, for fab & assembly - Wed (yesterday), firm said they could not do the job - Dan investigating a firm Rochester Hills (suburb of Detroit) - in-house assembly of first few not considered feasible (1500 parts/board, BGA's, etc.) UIC: Cabling (M. Camuyrano) ------------ See Mario's talk on: http://dzero.phy.uic.edu/~marioc/ , click on "Talk 11/14/2004" o Mock-up of patch panel - current design (for patch panel) seems to work - see photographs in talk . have done this test using scrap BLS cables o Impedance matching & attenuation - pulse shape (square pulse) and attenutation (sine wave) measured for different values of the "R2" resistor on the patch panel. (see slides for traces and plots) - R2 = 8 Ohms cleans up the signal, give attenuation of about 0.80 at 13 MHz - Dan will at plots and numbers on web page and send mail to Mario et al. concerning what is appropriate for ADF input Simulation (S. Lammers) ---------- o simulation meeting on 19-Oct - default EM algorithm establish for firmware work to proceed at Nevis - follow up investigations . Greg investigated futher the tower sharing of low-ET electrons: looks consistent with J. Heinmiller's RunIIa L2 studies o pedestal subtraction - difference found between tsimL1cal2b and trigger rate tool: only highest 256 towers included in tsim, and no negative values - if there is no ped subtraction, it has implications for EM algorithms: can't do "fraction" cuts - ADF peak finding algorithm studied for 132 ns had a "rectifier effect", suppressing negative fluctuations: probably not an issue for 396 ns. - need a written description of planned treatment of pedestals for RunIIb