# Exercise 8: Picking a physics cut **(15 minutes)** Go back and run the script you created in Exercise 5. If you've overwritten it, you can copy my version: %cp ~seligman/root-class/AnalyzeExercise5.py $PWD %load AnalyzeExercise5.py :::{note} The chi2 distribution and the scatterplot hint that something interesting may be going on. The histogram, whose limits I originally got from the command `tree1.Draw("chi2")`, looks unusual: there's a peak around 1, but the x-axis extends far beyond that, up to chi2 > 18. Evidently there are some events with a large chi2, but not enough of them to show up on the plot. On the scatterplot, we can see a dark band that represents the main peak of the chi2 distribution, and a scattering of dots that represents a group of events with anomalously high chi2. The chi2 represents a confidence level in reconstructing the particle's trajectory. If chi2 is high, the trajectory reconstruction was poor. It would be acceptable to apply a cut of "chi2 < 1.5", but let's see if we can correlate a large chi2 with anything else. ::: Make a scatterplot of `chi2` versus `theta`. It's easiest if you just copy the relevant lines from your code in Exercise 7; there's a file `AnalyzeExercise7.py` in my area if it will help. :::{note} Take a careful look at the scatterplot. It looks like all the large-chi2 values are found in the region theta > 0.15 radians. It may be that our trajectory-finding code has a problem with large angles. Let's put in both a theta cut and a chi2 cut to be certain we're looking at a sample of events with good reconstructed trajectories. ::: Use an `if` statement to only fill your histograms if chi2 < 1.5 and theta < 0.15. Change the bin limits of your histograms to reflect these cuts; for example, there's no point to putting bins above 1.5 in your chi2 histograms since you know there won't be any events in those bins after cuts. :::{note} It may help to remember that, in Python, you'll want something like `( chi2 < 1.5 and theta < 0.15 )` A tip for the future: in a real analysis, you'd probably have to make plots of your results both before and after cuts. A physicist usually wants to see the effects of cuts on their data. I must confess: I cheated when I pointed you directly to theta as the cause of the high-chi2 events. I knew this because I wrote the program that created the tree. If you want to look at this program yourself, go to the UNIX window and type: > less ~seligman/root-class/CreateTree.C :::