# Walkthrough: Simple analysis using the Draw command, part 2 **(10 minutes)** Instead of just plotting a single variable, let's try plotting two variables at once: tree1.Draw("ebeam:px") my_canvas.Draw() :::{note} This is a scatterplot, a handy way of observing the correlations between two variables. The `Draw` command interprets the variables as ("y:x") to decide which axes to use. It's easy to fall into the trap of thinking that each (x,y) point on a scatterplot represents two values in your n-tuple. The scatterplot is a grid; each square in the grid is randomly populated with a density of dots proportional to the number of values in that square. ::: Try making scatterplots of different pairs of variables. Do you see any correlations? :::{note} If you see a shapeless blob on the scatterplot, the variables are likely to be uncorrelated; for example, plot **`px`** versus **`py`**. If you see a pattern, there may be a correlation; for example, plot **`pz`** versus **`zv`**. It appears that the higher **`pz`** is, the lower **`zv`** is, and vice versa. Perhaps the particle loses energy before it is deflected in the target. ::: Let's create a "cut" (a limit on the range of a variable): tree1.Draw("zv","zv<20") my_canvas.Draw() Look at the x-axis of the histogram. Compare this with: tree1.Draw("zv") my_canvas.Draw() :::{note} Note that ROOT determines an appropriate range for the x-axis of your histogram. Enjoy this while you can; this feature is lost when you start using analysis scripts.[^f91] ::: A variable in a cut does not have to be one of the variables you're plotting: tree1.Draw("ebeam","zv<20") Try this with some of the other variables in the tree. ROOT's symbol for logical AND is `&&`. Try using this in a cut, e.g.: tree1.Draw("ebeam","px>10 && zv<20") [^f91]: After this point, I won't include the `my_canvas.Draw()` line in future examples, and you'll have to remember to execute that line. I assume you've gotten into the habit of re-using or cut-and-pasting lines between cells.